Total Disaster Programs in Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,688
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Alabama totaled $31,243,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Peacock Timber Company Inc | Troy, AL 36081 | $52,875 |
82 | Daniel & Son Inc | Union Springs, AL 36089 | $52,875 |
83 | Findley Timber Inc | Lapine, AL 36046 | $52,875 |
84 | Rebel Forest Products Inc | Salem, AL 36874 | $52,875 |
85 | Dry Creek Loggers Inc | Elba, AL 36323 | $52,875 |
86 | Charles M Money Logging Co Inc | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $52,875 |
87 | Bradford Agriculture LLC | Thomasville, AL 36784 | $52,875 |
88 | Mickey H Pope | Dixons Mills, AL 36736 | $52,875 |
89 | James Fields | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $52,875 |
90 | Greg Goines | Toxey, AL 36921 | $52,875 |
91 | Patrick Brown | Epes, AL 35460 | $52,875 |
92 | Warren Brown | York, AL 36925 | $52,875 |
93 | C Robinson Trucking LLC | Akron, AL 35441 | $52,875 |
94 | Pete Barnette Logging Inc | Sawyerville, AL 36776 | $52,875 |
95 | Tml Freight Company LLC | Maplesville, AL 36750 | $52,875 |
96 | Tombigbee Timber Company LLC | Livingston, AL 35470 | $52,875 |
97 | William Enterprises LLC | Safford, AL 36773 | $52,875 |
98 | Jerry Odom Logging LLC | Alabaster, AL 35007 | $52,875 |
99 | Hillabee Forestry Co LLC | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $52,875 |
100 | Geoff Collins Logging | Alpine, AL 35014 | $52,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”