Total Conservation Programs in Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 26,237
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Alabama totaled $545,445,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ivalene M Shields | Hartford, AL 36344 | $378,734 |
122 | Bert K Curtis | Troy, AL 36079 | $377,754 |
123 | Riggs Land Company Ltd | Selma, AL 36701 | $373,252 |
124 | Joel W Marsh | Clearwater, FL 33767 | $367,662 |
125 | Emma J Moore | Selma, AL 36701 | $366,977 |
126 | Tombigbee Properties LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $366,429 |
127 | Northern Alabama Trust Howard Hud | Santa Barbara, CA 93101 | $365,729 |
128 | James M Sullivan | Pensacola, FL 32503 | $365,329 |
129 | John Haas Strother | Camden, AL 36726 | $363,640 |
130 | Clark Farms Limited Partnership | Mathews, AL 36052 | $359,607 |
131 | R M Hall III | Columbus, GA 31904 | $359,401 |
132 | Hale Plantation Inc | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $359,273 |
133 | Joe R Crawford | Baileyton, AL 35019 | $357,634 |
134 | Tilkit Land Co Inc | Hurtsboro, AL 36860 | $354,349 |
135 | Richland Farms LLC | Opelika, AL 36803 | $353,199 |
136 | J A Hughes Farm Inc | Hartford, AL 36344 | $352,673 |
137 | Gladys W Kennedy Est Trust | Hartford, AL 36344 | $350,616 |
138 | River Bluff Farm LLC | Hartford, AL 36344 | $350,124 |
139 | Genevieve J Mccullough | Decatur, AL 35603 | $347,934 |
140 | James G Watson | Catherine, AL 36728 | $347,662 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”