Direct Payment Program in Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 26,742
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Alabama totaled $468,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Mcclenney Farms /js | Headland, AL 36345 | $457,178 |
142 | David W Harms | Summerdale, AL 36580 | $457,124 |
143 | Tanner Farms | Greenville, AL 36037 | $456,689 |
144 | Joe Mack Powell Jr | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $454,580 |
145 | David E Bitto Dba Bitto Farms | Elberta, AL 36530 | $454,369 |
146 | Weber Farms LLC | Atmore, AL 36502 | $453,409 |
147 | Griffiths Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $450,548 |
148 | Givhan Land & Cattle Co Inc | Safford, AL 36773 | $449,312 |
149 | Chandler Farming Partnership | Hollywood, AL 35752 | $448,801 |
150 | Three W Farms | Andalusia, AL 36421 | $446,292 |
151 | Huguley Farms Inc | Coffee Springs, AL 36318 | $443,303 |
152 | William Tony Gargis Sr Dba Tony Gargis Farms | Leighton, AL 35646 | $441,949 |
153 | Paul Clark Farm | Courtland, AL 35618 | $435,833 |
154 | William Nathan Mathis | Newton, AL 36352 | $435,225 |
155 | F & W Farms Inc | New Hope, AL 35760 | $433,306 |
156 | Corcoran Farms Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $432,697 |
157 | Harrison Farms Inc | Atmore, AL 36502 | $430,017 |
158 | Yance Farms Inc | Columbia, AL 36319 | $421,510 |
159 | Cunningham Farms | Stockton, AL 36579 | $421,483 |
160 | Ray Lamar Foley | Red Level, AL 36474 | $420,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”