Farm Subsidy information
Alabama
Total Subsidies in Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 89,603
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alabama totaled $5,227,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Martin Farm | Courtland, AL 35618 | $15,193,841 |
2 | Newby Farms | Athens, AL 35613 | $13,937,832 |
3 | Haney Farms | Athens, AL 35611 | $12,756,546 |
4 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $12,437,828 |
5 | Darden Bridgeforth And Sons | Tanner, AL 35671 | $11,079,356 |
6 | Benton Farms | Benton, AL 36785 | $10,913,785 |
7 | Blythe Cotton Company | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $9,860,179 |
8 | Hamilton Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $9,683,123 |
9 | Helton Brothers Farm | Atmore, AL 36504 | $9,450,699 |
10 | Wiggins Farm | Andalusia, AL 36420 | $8,973,352 |
11 | Isbell Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $8,765,999 |
12 | Westover Planting Co | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $8,613,381 |
13 | Lee Farm | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $8,248,711 |
14 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $8,189,705 |
15 | Vaden Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $7,913,078 |
16 | J B Hain Co | Sardis, AL 36775 | $7,849,987 |
17 | Devaney Brothers Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $7,251,552 |
18 | Home Place Partners | Prattville, AL 36066 | $7,048,510 |
19 | Liikatchka Plantation General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $6,450,332 |
20 | Red Land Farms | Moulton, AL 35650 | $6,422,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>