Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Alabama, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 206

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Alabama totaled $26,838,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2023
21Scott Davis Chip Co IncBrent, AL 35034$373,565
22Baseline Forest Service IncWetumpka, AL 36092$348,506
23Industree Timber IncWetumpka, AL 36092$347,542
24Easterling Brothers & Sons IncBrewton, AL 36426$342,031
25Southern Wood Chips IncJasper, AL 35502$311,310
26Oakley Biomass IncFlorence, AL 35630$302,856
27Judson IncPennington, AL 36916$299,768
28Tripp Stallworth Land And TimberMonroeville, AL 36461$288,923
29Red Mountain Harvesting LLCPace, FL 32571$281,527
30Buchanan Timber & Forestry LLCSelma, AL 36702$276,254
31C & C Construction LLCDuncanville, AL 35456$270,415
32James R Fincher Timber Company IncWilmer, AL 36587$243,045
33Rayonier Trs South Timber LLCJacksonville, FL 32202$242,043
34Weyerhaeuser Nr CompanySweet Water, AL 36782$239,390
35Glenwood Forest Products LLCEnterprise, AL 36330$237,099
36R L Carnes Logging Contractor IncMonroeville, AL 36460$234,085
37Hamilton Timber Company LtdNanafalia, AL 36764$231,272
38Sumter Timber CompanyDemopolis, AL 36732$227,146
39Lower Dixie Timber IncThomasville, AL 36784$224,457
40Parnell IncMaplesville, AL 36750$206,360

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag