Farm Subsidy information
Alabama
Total Subsidies in Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 89,603
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alabama totaled $5,227,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wendland Farms | Autaugaville, AL 36003 | $6,355,048 |
22 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $6,353,234 |
23 | Tate Farms | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $6,251,084 |
24 | D & C Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $6,113,337 |
25 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $6,010,650 |
26 | Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $5,988,699 |
27 | Cannon Farms | Theodore, AL 36590 | $5,870,338 |
28 | Henderson Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $5,850,797 |
29 | Counts Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $5,690,008 |
30 | Herman Rochester & Sons | Leesburg, AL 35983 | $5,511,907 |
31 | Wisener Farms | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $5,443,521 |
32 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $5,417,347 |
33 | Pitchford Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $5,415,342 |
34 | P & J Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $5,324,024 |
35 | Sublett Farms | Ardmore, AL 35739 | $5,212,897 |
36 | Ward Farms | Atmore, AL 36502 | $5,098,915 |
37 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $5,057,973 |
38 | Bragg Farming Company | Toney, AL 35773 | $5,043,254 |
39 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $5,013,325 |
40 | George Jeffcoat Farms-03 | Gordon, AL 36343 | $4,989,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”