Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Alabama, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 269
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Alabama totaled $2,492,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pearce Catfish Farms Inc | Marion Jct, AL 36759 | $793,762 |
2 | Kyser Family Farms LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $350,315 |
3 | Williamson Cattle Co | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $197,677 |
4 | Drury Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $173,771 |
5 | Lee Jackson | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $165,496 |
6 | B & C Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $152,625 |
7 | Dean Wilson Farm LLC | Marion Junction, AL 36759 | $147,581 |
8 | Prairie Lakes Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $131,424 |
9 | De Broussard Farm LLC | Newbern, AL 36765 | $117,686 |
10 | Rocking R Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $59,764 |
11 | Sims Farms LLC | Faunsdale, AL 36738 | $45,970 |
12 | Dombhart Farm L L C | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $27,584 |
13 | , | $14,563 | |
14 | Allyson A Andrews | Eclectic, AL 36024 | $11,763 |
15 | Gregory Adam Stansell | Ashville, AL 35953 | $10,770 |
16 | Ted Kretschmann | Dadeville, AL 36853 | $5,496 |
17 | Lemay Enterprises, Inc Dba As T&a Bee Farm | Russellville, AL 35653 | $5,347 |
18 | Thomas D Ray | Waterloo, AL 35677 | $4,070 |
19 | Gary And Dustin Peek Farms Pship | Athens, AL 35614 | $3,039 |
20 | George Spry Mitchell | Florence, AL 35633 | $2,689 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>