Loan Deficiency in Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,514
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Alabama totaled $205,534,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Benton Farms | Tyler, AL 36785 | $2,486,222 |
2 | Martin Farm | Courtland, AL 35618 | $1,903,308 |
3 | Blythe Cotton Company | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $1,647,753 |
4 | Herman Rochester & Sons | Leesburg, AL 35983 | $1,415,133 |
5 | Lee Farm | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $1,254,811 |
6 | Red Land Farms | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,240,639 |
7 | Bibb Mims & Co | Uriah, AL 36480 | $1,129,773 |
8 | Wisener Farms | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $1,119,406 |
9 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $1,083,506 |
10 | Helton Brothers Farm | Atmore, AL 36504 | $1,076,280 |
11 | Lamon Farm | Trinity, AL 35673 | $940,477 |
12 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $890,283 |
13 | Minor Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $860,416 |
14 | Byrd Farms | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $809,675 |
15 | D & C Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $790,755 |
16 | Williams And Casaday Farms | Childersburg, AL 35044 | $790,185 |
17 | Brown & Brown Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $789,998 |
18 | Woodrow K Cheatwood | Anniston, AL 36207 | $772,406 |
19 | Mcmichen & Son | Centre, AL 35960 | $768,779 |
20 | Dorland Farms | Mobile, AL 36695 | $737,703 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>