Farm Subsidy information
Alabama
Total Subsidies in Alabama, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,499
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alabama totaled $247,571,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vaden Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $743,935 |
22 | Wells Fargo Bank ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $742,040 |
23 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $740,465 |
24 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $739,054 |
25 | D & C Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $736,764 |
26 | Helton Brothers Farm | Atmore, AL 36504 | $727,528 |
27 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $720,995 |
28 | Letson Brothers Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $711,413 |
29 | P & J Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $691,690 |
30 | Wiggins Farm | Andalusia, AL 36420 | $657,170 |
31 | Devaney Brothers Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $654,858 |
32 | Alabama Ag Credit Aca ** | Monroeville, AL 36461 | $642,551 |
33 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $624,260 |
34 | United Bank Of Atmore ** | Atmore, AL 36504 | $609,016 |
35 | Hamilton Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $584,112 |
36 | Chris Thompson Farms Gp | Midland City, AL 36350 | $580,276 |
37 | Coosa River Land Co | Centre, AL 35960 | $574,975 |
38 | Walters Farming Company | Gallion, AL 36742 | $552,236 |
39 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $549,184 |
40 | Isbell Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $544,307 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”