Counter Cyclical Program in Baldwin County, Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 247
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Baldwin County, Alabama totaled $13,831,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Doug Lowell Jr | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $208,367 |
22 | John Mullek | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $206,919 |
23 | Gordon Barnhill Jr | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $189,101 |
24 | Riebeling Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $181,503 |
25 | Charles N Dean | Little River, AL 36550 | $179,650 |
26 | Frederick W Leiterman Farms | Elberta, AL 36530 | $171,112 |
27 | John Krupinski | Foley, AL 36535 | $148,190 |
28 | Jeff Parker | Perdido, AL 36562 | $146,413 |
29 | Hilbert Eric Hall | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $141,293 |
30 | James Lipscomb & Sons Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $141,218 |
31 | Joseph B Mullek Farm | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $140,617 |
32 | Douglas M Kaiser Jr | Atmore, AL 36502 | $139,255 |
33 | Jgj Farms Inc | Daphne, AL 36526 | $130,000 |
34 | Walter C Kichler | Elberta, AL 36530 | $114,979 |
35 | Charles Bonner | Summerdale, AL 36580 | $109,824 |
36 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $102,521 |
37 | Charles Kichler & Sons | Elberta, AL 36530 | $102,463 |
38 | Fairhope Dairy | Point Clear, AL 36564 | $99,852 |
39 | Chad Devine | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $97,596 |
40 | Ronald A Koptis | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $96,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”