Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,144
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Alabama totaled $29,359,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | West Butler Farms Inc | Honoraville, AL 36042 | $2,614,125 |
2 | Whiddon Farms Inc | Greenville, AL 36037 | $1,684,815 |
3 | Tanner Farms | Greenville, AL 36037 | $1,180,640 |
4 | Tanner Farms | Greenville, AL 36037 | $1,142,118 |
5 | Wayne Kervin | Georgiana, AL 36033 | $1,057,185 |
6 | Tindal Farms Inc | Greenville, AL 36037 | $751,005 |
7 | William Henry Golson | Fort Deposit, AL 36032 | $733,985 |
8 | Larry Page | Georgiana, AL 36033 | $544,682 |
9 | William Crawford Henry | Selma, AL 36701 | $510,114 |
10 | William C Henry Farms LLC | Sardis, AL 36775 | $349,235 |
11 | Bobbi O Royster | Mc Kenzie, AL 36456 | $323,604 |
12 | Sandra Marie Jones | Georgiana, AL 36033 | $254,742 |
13 | W James Thagard Jr | Greenville, AL 36037 | $245,307 |
14 | Jeffrey M Luckie | Greenville, AL 36037 | $222,844 |
15 | Myron Salter | Mc Kenzie, AL 36456 | $221,996 |
16 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Portageville, MO 63873 | $198,162 |
17 | James Lamar Odom | Mc Kenzie, AL 36456 | $196,871 |
18 | Buchanan Timber & Forestry LLC | Selma, AL 36702 | $194,790 |
19 | J N Poole Jr | Forest Home, AL 36030 | $192,436 |
20 | Steven T Tindal | Honoraville, AL 36042 | $173,606 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>