Conservation Reserve Program in Coffee County, Alabama, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 104
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Coffee County, Alabama totaled $205,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alice Moore Trust | Elba, AL 36323 | $1,104 |
62 | , | $1,066 | |
63 | Bob H Bowdoin | Samson, AL 36477 | $1,044 |
64 | Julian B Lecompte | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $1,019 |
65 | James A Godwin | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $1,000 |
66 | Claire Elaine Hanson Revocable Trust | Fuquay Varina, NC 27526 | $993 |
67 | William C Mitchell | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $918 |
68 | Deborah M Kennedy | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $909 |
69 | Biggs 2005 Family Trust | Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 | $861 |
70 | Samuel J Windham | Elba, AL 36323 | $841 |
71 | Jerry W Thames | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $836 |
72 | Estelene B Helms | Brundidge, AL 36010 | $827 |
73 | Jerry W Kelley | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $790 |
74 | Daniel Macgregor | Samson, AL 36477 | $778 |
75 | Chad Michael Lacy | Chancellor, AL 36316 | $709 |
76 | Sally Ann Danford | Elba, AL 36323 | $697 |
77 | Amy R Parrish | Coffee Springs, AL 36318 | $690 |
78 | Cassandra R Odom | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $659 |
79 | Dan Presley | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $615 |
80 | Marilyn Smith | New Brockton, AL 36351 | $574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”