Total Commodity Programs in Colbert County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 324
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Colbert County, Alabama totaled $2,324,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jeremy Daniel Palmer | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $7,798 |
42 | 4-m Services, LLC | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $7,548 |
43 | Preuit And Fennel Family Limited Partnership | Leighton, AL 35646 | $7,385 |
44 | Noble Investments Ltd | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $6,922 |
45 | James Cahoon III | Cherokee, AL 35616 | $6,249 |
46 | Charles H Keeton Dba Keeton Farms | Cherokee, AL 35616 | $5,629 |
47 | Harris-harris Ltd Partnership | Birmingham, AL 35202 | $5,496 |
48 | Judy F Vials | Leighton, AL 35646 | $5,261 |
49 | Fennel-noble General Partnership | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $4,816 |
50 | P & J Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $4,276 |
51 | Bullington Farms LLC | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $3,920 |
52 | Raymond Larry Aday | Leighton, AL 35646 | $3,879 |
53 | Four D Farms, Llp | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $3,831 |
54 | T E Masterson | Leighton, AL 35646 | $3,778 |
55 | William Carter Reid | Florence, AL 35630 | $3,719 |
56 | Bryan Vandiver | Leighton, AL 35646 | $3,578 |
57 | Fennel-noble Family Ltd Prtship | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $3,206 |
58 | Robert E Austin | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $3,019 |
59 | Ann C Cross | Florence, AL 35630 | $2,973 |
60 | Mark L Fennel | Leighton, AL 35646 | $2,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”