Conservation Reserve Program in Colbert County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 230
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Colbert County, Alabama totaled $5,090,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donna L Holland | Leighton, AL 35646 | $48,684 |
22 | Scott Reid | Glens Falls, NY 12801 | $44,169 |
23 | Betty Jean Hester | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $42,810 |
24 | William Britton | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $40,999 |
25 | Peggy Martin | Leighton, AL 35646 | $40,765 |
26 | W D Cornelius III | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $40,340 |
27 | James T Johnson | Cherokee, AL 35616 | $39,493 |
28 | Vernon Askew | Unknown, AL 35616 | $39,048 |
29 | W J Hooper | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $38,371 |
30 | Donnie Trousdale | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $36,585 |
31 | Jimmy Martin | Leighton, AL 35646 | $34,905 |
32 | Grace Bishop | Cherokee, AL 35616 | $33,253 |
33 | William Jefferson Mitchell Jr | Columbia, MO 65203 | $32,644 |
34 | Ollie Counts | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $31,740 |
35 | Thomas E Minor | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $29,808 |
36 | William H Alexander Jr | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $29,568 |
37 | Linda Shelton | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $28,915 |
38 | Underwood Farms | Leighton, AL 35646 | $27,949 |
39 | Edgar Ray Woodis | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $26,762 |
40 | James Clyde Bingham | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $26,506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”