Farm Subsidy information
Cullman County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Cullman County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,513
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cullman County, Alabama totaled $40,609,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Christopher L Shedd | Holly Pond, AL 35083 | $1,486,764 |
2 | Howard Bartlett | Cullman, AL 35058 | $1,004,512 |
3 | Jerry Yancy | Baileyton, AL 35019 | $894,103 |
4 | Brian S Kress | Cullman, AL 35058 | $810,198 |
5 | Jeffrey Allan James | Hanceville, AL 35077 | $807,732 |
6 | Haynes Farms LLC | Cullman, AL 35058 | $705,214 |
7 | Michael L Finley | Blountsville, AL 35031 | $594,558 |
8 | R W Huddleston | Cullman, AL 35058 | $546,350 |
9 | Norman Keith Smith | Cullman, AL 35058 | $541,770 |
10 | William Clark Haynes | Cullman, AL 35057 | $541,597 |
11 | Joey Stephens | Cullman, AL 35058 | $476,995 |
12 | Todd Scott | Cullman, AL 35058 | $337,264 |
13 | Ronald Smith Jr | Cullman, AL 35055 | $329,582 |
14 | George Burmester | Cullman, AL 35055 | $322,753 |
15 | Richard Hunter | Baileyton, AL 35019 | $316,891 |
16 | E Wayne Widner | Hanceville, AL 35077 | $306,655 |
17 | A Floyd Michelfelder | Hanceville, AL 35077 | $304,609 |
18 | Jodie Huddleston | Cullman, AL 35058 | $277,156 |
19 | Carroll Douglas Haynes | Hanceville, AL 35077 | $269,312 |
20 | Douglas Rhodes | Lascassas, TN 37085 | $264,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>