Farm Subsidy information
Dale County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Dale County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 326
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dale County, Alabama totaled $7,111,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $81,206 |
22 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $63,666 |
23 | Balkcom Farms | Midland City, AL 36350 | $60,431 |
24 | Perry T Stevens Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $60,163 |
25 | Stephanie L Stevens | Midland City, AL 36350 | $59,963 |
26 | Linda W Roller | Newton, AL 36352 | $59,824 |
27 | Jonathan Clay Tharpe | Skipperville, AL 36374 | $59,748 |
28 | Austin James Ward | Newville, AL 36353 | $58,116 |
29 | Robert Ashley Beasley | Newton, AL 36352 | $57,637 |
30 | Robert W Helms | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $51,527 |
31 | Tung T Nguyen | Ozark, AL 36360 | $51,485 |
32 | Auston Lane Walden | Daleville, AL 36322 | $47,399 |
33 | Thomas A Lavender | Brundidge, AL 36010 | $46,030 |
34 | Nowell Enterprises Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $41,769 |
35 | Djl Company | Headland, AL 36345 | $41,161 |
36 | Larry Paul Morrison | Ariton, AL 36311 | $38,906 |
37 | Billy Ray Gassett | Skipperville, AL 36374 | $35,922 |
38 | Glenn O Dell | Midland City, AL 36350 | $34,902 |
39 | Terry W Carpenter | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $32,097 |
40 | Theo Lee | Daleville, AL 36322 | $28,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”