Farm Subsidy information
Dale County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Dale County, Alabama, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 236
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dale County, Alabama totaled $4,924,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chris Thompson Farms Gp | Midland City, AL 36350 | $532,422 |
2 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $372,448 |
3 | I4c Limited LLC Dba 134 Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $117,108 |
4 | Beasley Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $116,625 |
5 | Kirkland Kreek Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $104,438 |
6 | Mark Donnell Farms | Daleville, AL 36322 | $100,196 |
7 | William L Bullock Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $82,108 |
8 | Pouncey Farms LLC | Daleville, AL 36322 | $80,483 |
9 | David E Byrd | Midland City, AL 36350 | $71,952 |
10 | Clay Ellenburg Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $71,511 |
11 | Thomas Kirkland Farm | Headland, AL 36345 | $68,734 |
12 | Glenn O Dell | Midland City, AL 36350 | $65,205 |
13 | Austin James Ward | Newville, AL 36353 | $64,697 |
14 | Jared W Curry | Midland City, AL 36350 | $61,210 |
15 | Thomas A Lavender | Brundidge, AL 36010 | $57,248 |
16 | Jonathan Clay Tharpe | Skipperville, AL 36374 | $53,911 |
17 | Robert Ashley Beasley | Newton, AL 36352 | $50,138 |
18 | , | $46,501 | |
19 | Stephanie L Stevens | Midland City, AL 36350 | $42,964 |
20 | Perry T Stevens Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $40,929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>