Farm Subsidy information
Elmore County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Elmore County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 895
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Elmore County, Alabama totaled $65,171,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jimmy D Mask | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $339,893 |
42 | Riley J Mask Jr | Eclectic, AL 36024 | $310,988 |
43 | Larry James Farmer | Deatsville, AL 36022 | $305,856 |
44 | Priscilla S Crommelin | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $290,352 |
45 | State Of Alabama | Montgomery, AL 36130 | $276,648 |
46 | Janice M Palmer | Montgomery, AL 36110 | $240,904 |
47 | Ernest E Woodfin Jr | Deatsville, AL 36022 | $234,930 |
48 | Robert M Barrett | Deatsville, AL 36022 | $226,798 |
49 | Bar Neal Farms LLC | Wetumpka, AL 36092 | $225,428 |
50 | Philip Varner | Wetumpka, AL 36092 | $218,933 |
51 | Maddox-screws Partners | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $216,366 |
52 | Lloyd's Green Acres Farm | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $216,245 |
53 | James L Smith | Marbury, AL 36051 | $214,555 |
54 | Tallapoosa Farmers Service Inc | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $198,915 |
55 | Super-step Div Corp | Montgomery, AL 36101 | $194,111 |
56 | Clearwater Foresters Inc | Wetumpka, AL 36092 | $188,270 |
57 | Louie Donald Wilson | Marbury, AL 36051 | $186,510 |
58 | Douglas Terrell | Titus, AL 36080 | $178,441 |
59 | Wcs LLC | Montgomery, AL 36104 | $175,326 |
60 | Stanley Kirt Wilson | Marbury, AL 36051 | $167,929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”