Loan Deficiency in Escambia County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 247
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Escambia County, Alabama totaled $12,690,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Roger M Jansen | Atmore, AL 36502 | $17,770 |
102 | Jimmie G Jones | Jay, FL 32565 | $17,304 |
103 | James H Caraway | Atmore, AL 36502 | $16,840 |
104 | Diller Farms | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $16,675 |
105 | Ercell Womack | Atmore, AL 36502 | $16,585 |
106 | Michael Diller | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $16,534 |
107 | Adele Wallace | Calera, AL 35040 | $16,117 |
108 | Hilbert Eric Hall | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $15,546 |
109 | Lori Beth Diller | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $15,246 |
110 | J Maynard Koehn | Century, FL 32535 | $15,079 |
111 | Douglas M Kaiser Jr | Atmore, AL 36502 | $14,901 |
112 | B Glen Wiggins Jr | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $13,400 |
113 | Lucinda Michelle Helton | Atmore, AL 36502 | $13,337 |
114 | Kevin Blake Holland | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $13,286 |
115 | W Harvey Ashcraft | Atmore, AL 36502 | $12,919 |
116 | Benny D Biggs | Atmore, AL 36502 | $12,484 |
117 | Jarrett W Dykes | Brewton, AL 36426 | $12,084 |
118 | Angela Shelly | Atmore, AL 36504 | $11,461 |
119 | Wendell Eicher Farms | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $11,203 |
120 | Mickey H Parker | Atmore, AL 36502 | $10,705 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”