Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Fayette County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 110
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Fayette County, Alabama totaled $140,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jerry L Hallman | Fayette, AL 35555 | $1,909 |
22 | Scotty Aldridge | Bankston, AL 35542 | $1,818 |
23 | Timothy O Shirley | Gordo, AL 35466 | $1,797 |
24 | Kenneth B Holliman | Kennedy, AL 35574 | $1,693 |
25 | Alan Magouirk | Bankston, AL 35542 | $1,639 |
26 | John Norris | Winfield, AL 35594 | $1,628 |
27 | Ricky Hollingsworth | Eldridge, AL 35554 | $1,546 |
28 | Jeff Norris | Bankston, AL 35542 | $1,537 |
29 | Mitchell J Waldrop | Fayette, AL 35555 | $1,435 |
30 | Cole Allen Kimbrell | Northport, AL 35475 | $1,414 |
31 | Clarence E Cargile | Fayette, AL 35555 | $1,374 |
32 | Dennis Ray Mccollum | Eldridge, AL 35554 | $1,350 |
33 | W David Shepherd | Berry, AL 35546 | $1,350 |
34 | Timothy S Brown | Gordo, AL 35466 | $1,345 |
35 | Betty Lou Hollingsworth | Eldridge, AL 35554 | $1,305 |
36 | Robert Whitley | Fayette, AL 35555 | $1,297 |
37 | Galloway Farms | Fayette, AL 35555 | $1,280 |
38 | Patricia Diane Pendley | Berry, AL 35546 | $1,229 |
39 | Steven R Ballard | Berry, AL 35546 | $1,226 |
40 | Timothy G Nelson | Berry, AL 35546 | $1,224 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”