Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) in Hale County, Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) from farms in Hale County, Alabama totaled $346,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers Program (TAAF) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kyser Farms LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $18,733 |
2 | Prairie Lakes Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $16,356 |
3 | B & J Catfish Farm Inc | Newbern, AL 36765 | $15,911 |
4 | Rocking R Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $15,678 |
5 | James Henry Sims | Faunsdale, AL 36738 | $14,392 |
6 | James Fisheries Inc | Newbern, AL 36765 | $14,000 |
7 | Daniel Clemmer | Uniontown, AL 36786 | $13,553 |
8 | Matthew Clemmer | Newbern, AL 36765 | $12,928 |
9 | Curtis Gvillo | Moundville, AL 35474 | $12,000 |
10 | Daniel Miller | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $12,000 |
11 | James P York | Gallion, AL 36742 | $12,000 |
12 | James A Acker Jr | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $12,000 |
13 | Williamson Cattle Co | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $12,000 |
14 | Timothy Wenger | Newbern, AL 36765 | $12,000 |
15 | Dombhart Farm L L C | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $12,000 |
16 | Dave Wenger | Faunsdale, AL 36738 | $12,000 |
17 | Pineview Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $12,000 |
18 | Koehn Catfish Farm Inc | Newbern, AL 36765 | $12,000 |
19 | Little Rock Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $12,000 |
20 | Kyser LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $12,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>