Farm Subsidy information
Hale County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Hale County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,279
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hale County, Alabama totaled $48,156,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James A Acker Jr | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $917,904 |
2 | Jeffery S Weeks | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $893,590 |
3 | J-pat | Atmore, AL 36502 | $793,775 |
4 | Drury Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $783,399 |
5 | Kyser Family Farms LLC | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $733,557 |
6 | James P York | Gallion, AL 36742 | $723,167 |
7 | Chris W Elliott | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $669,327 |
8 | Langston And Elliott | Blytheville, AR 72316 | $625,068 |
9 | Brandon Jones | Gallion, AL 36742 | $586,465 |
10 | Williamson Cattle Co | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $559,137 |
11 | L & G Operations Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $524,520 |
12 | Prairie Lakes Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $513,240 |
13 | B & C Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $465,097 |
14 | James A Acker | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $459,663 |
15 | Cherry Cattle Co Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $453,345 |
16 | Harry R Horn Jr | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $415,485 |
17 | Dombhart Farm L L C | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $409,150 |
18 | Charis Farm General Partnership | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $404,465 |
19 | Keith H Glover | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $388,863 |
20 | 3c Cattle Company Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $385,968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>