Farm Subsidy information
Henry County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Henry County, Alabama, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,507
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Henry County, Alabama totaled $234,407,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pitchford Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $4,459,225 |
2 | Adams Farms Partnership | Newville, AL 36353 | $3,353,285 |
3 | White Farms | Newville, AL 36353 | $3,303,886 |
4 | Parker Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,969,730 |
5 | Charles Phillip Hayes | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $2,966,313 |
6 | K & E Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,612,109 |
7 | Bristow Farms Partnership | Columbia, AL 36319 | $2,578,832 |
8 | Falkner Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,528,071 |
9 | Danny Ellison | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,479,541 |
10 | James C And Mary J Parker Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,288,600 |
11 | Hinson Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,275,780 |
12 | Phillips Farms | Shorterville, AL 36373 | $2,263,486 |
13 | Marty Rushing | Headland, AL 36345 | $2,134,228 |
14 | Jerry Blount | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $2,057,347 |
15 | Mims Farms/tm | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $2,010,744 |
16 | D And M Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $1,896,200 |
17 | Thomas W Kennedy | Shorterville, AL 36373 | $1,846,477 |
18 | Circle W Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $1,800,859 |
19 | Mcclenney Farms /js | Headland, AL 36345 | $1,768,563 |
20 | Holloman Farm | Columbia, AL 36319 | $1,618,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>