Total Commodity Programs in Henry County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 309
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Henry County, Alabama totaled $6,669,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dirty Pond Farms Inc | Newville, AL 36353 | $87,995 |
22 | Yj Farms, LLC | Columbia, AL 36319 | $86,411 |
23 | Windmill Investments LLC | Headland, AL 36345 | $84,978 |
24 | Scott Shelley Farms Inc. | Columbia, AL 36319 | $81,583 |
25 | Thomas W Kennedy | Shorterville, AL 36373 | $74,869 |
26 | Andrew H Armstrong | Headland, AL 36345 | $73,159 |
27 | Burke Family Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $73,063 |
28 | Powerline Peanut Farm LLC | Newville, AL 36353 | $66,652 |
29 | Rushing Farms LLC | Headland, AL 36345 | $65,584 |
30 | John W Solomon Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $58,610 |
31 | Jason Donald Burke | Headland, AL 36345 | $58,178 |
32 | We B Wet Farms, Inc. | Headland, AL 36345 | $56,638 |
33 | Chatt Valley Farm Inc | Abbeville, AL 36310 | $55,261 |
34 | Perryman F Mobley III | Shorterville, AL 36373 | $54,476 |
35 | Jason Burke Farms & Harvesting LLC | Headland, AL 36345 | $54,446 |
36 | Jonathan K Taylor | Columbia, AL 36319 | $53,792 |
37 | Michael E Starling Dba Starling Farms | Shorterville, AL 36373 | $52,341 |
38 | George E Lewis II | Newville, AL 36353 | $45,888 |
39 | Hayes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $44,680 |
40 | Franklin C Granberry | Headland, AL 36345 | $41,725 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”