Farm Subsidy information
Houston County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Houston County, Alabama, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 445
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Houston County, Alabama totaled $15,523,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Piney Grove Farm Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $16,370 |
122 | Marcy Carpenter | Newton, AL 36352 | $15,758 |
123 | C & C Excavating, LLC | Dothan, AL 36301 | $15,421 |
124 | Danny Ray Meredith | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $15,154 |
125 | Danny Bonner | Ashford, AL 36312 | $14,959 |
126 | Danny Ellison | Headland, AL 36345 | $14,677 |
127 | Thomas Allen Shirley | Cowarts, AL 36321 | $14,197 |
128 | Martha W Pybus Revocable Living Trust | Midland City, AL 36350 | $14,089 |
129 | David Sellers | Cottonwood, AL 36320 | $13,834 |
130 | Aaron T Wells | Taylor, AL 36301 | $13,308 |
131 | Charles Osmond North Estate | Vestavia Hills, AL 35216 | $13,090 |
132 | , | $12,688 | |
133 | W O Mack Inc | Pansey, AL 36370 | $12,557 |
134 | James C And Mary J Parker Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $12,512 |
135 | R D Wright Jr | Ashford, AL 36312 | $12,355 |
136 | S & S Development Company | Cowarts, AL 36321 | $12,340 |
137 | Marty Marshall Farms Partnership | Headland, AL 36345 | $12,302 |
138 | Mark And Kathaleen Nolin Farms | Graceville, FL 32440 | $11,987 |
139 | Mary Ann Hatcher | Newton, AL 36352 | $11,213 |
140 | Robert Reynolds | Ashford, AL 36312 | $11,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”