Farm Subsidy information
Houston County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Houston County, Alabama, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 445
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Houston County, Alabama totaled $15,523,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Stanley Nowell Farms | Webb, AL 36376 | $11,084 |
142 | Christopher J King | Newton, AL 36352 | $11,046 |
143 | John Remah Mcdaniel | Ashford, AL 36312 | $10,938 |
144 | Laken Pitchford | Columbia, AL 36319 | $10,938 |
145 | Clay Ellenburg Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $10,926 |
146 | Timothy C Love | Ashford, AL 36312 | $10,455 |
147 | Phillip M Barnes | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $10,410 |
148 | John W Solomon Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $10,308 |
149 | Amanda Nicole Granger | Blakely, GA 39823 | $10,290 |
150 | Allen R Barrentine | Newton, AL 36352 | $10,246 |
151 | Douglas Sinquefield | Ashford, AL 36312 | $10,139 |
152 | Buren Mcardle | Webb, AL 36376 | $10,046 |
153 | Double A Hay Farms LLC | Gordon, AL 36343 | $9,970 |
154 | Gambletown Farm Inc | Columbia, AL 36319 | $9,922 |
155 | Gordon Planting Company LLC | Dothan, AL 36301 | $9,857 |
156 | Jv & P Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $9,574 |
157 | , | $9,530 | |
158 | Mule Shoe Family Land And Timber LLC | Gordon, AL 36343 | $9,462 |
159 | Sue Ann Nowell | Ashford, AL 36312 | $9,332 |
160 | David E Holloman | Columbia, AL 36319 | $9,260 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”