Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Lawrence County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 135
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Lawrence County, Alabama totaled $997,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Marie Moody Brazel | Pontiac, MI 48340 | $1,675 |
102 | Lance Hopper | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,661 |
103 | David A Lynch | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,594 |
104 | Anita Preuit Hood | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,576 |
105 | Naylor Farms | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,575 |
106 | Kenny M White | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $1,541 |
107 | Dewey Parmer Linley | Adamsville, AL 35005 | $1,531 |
108 | Larry Louallen | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,505 |
109 | Benjamin F Dutton | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,456 |
110 | John Neal | Moulton, AL 35650 | $1,418 |
111 | Steve Martin | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $1,404 |
112 | Hollis Kidd | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $1,357 |
113 | Olean Owens | Danville, AL 35619 | $1,320 |
114 | Gwin Wilson | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $1,129 |
115 | Joe Potter | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $960 |
116 | Rachel Roden | Russellville, AL 35654 | $960 |
117 | Carrie L Sutton | Moulton, AL 35650 | $924 |
118 | Fred Richardson | Moulton, AL 35650 | $900 |
119 | Joseph C Chapman | Decatur, AL 35603 | $884 |
120 | Randel Hoyt Mullican | Moulton, AL 35650 | $851 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”