Farm Subsidy information
Marion County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Marion County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,598
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marion County, Alabama totaled $24,231,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Leburn Hudson | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $30,906 |
122 | Amelia M Batchelder | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $30,609 |
123 | Larry Jeffreys | Detroit, AL 35552 | $30,372 |
124 | Thomas H Coleman | Brilliant, AL 35548 | $30,258 |
125 | Richard L Lucas | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $29,479 |
126 | David Neal Smith | Macon, MS 39341 | $29,427 |
127 | Thomas A Beasley | Winfield, AL 35594 | $29,268 |
128 | Bexar Farms LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $29,261 |
129 | Claude Allen | Detroit, AL 35552 | $29,061 |
130 | Patsy J Ray | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $29,008 |
131 | Larry L Fincher | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $28,821 |
132 | Louise Warhurst | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $28,782 |
133 | Eddy Earl Vickery | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $28,729 |
134 | Hw Watson & Son Logging Inc | Vina, AL 35593 | $28,620 |
135 | The Christopher Farm LLC | Guin, AL 35563 | $28,041 |
136 | Joshua A Fincher | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $27,931 |
137 | Kyle D Fleming | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $27,922 |
138 | Jimmy L Stidham | Vina, AL 35593 | $27,850 |
139 | Hubert Mccullar | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $27,618 |
140 | Jerry R Swinney | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $27,451 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”