Total Commodity Programs in Marion County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 292
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Marion County, Alabama totaled $717,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edwin Dale Brasher Jr | Winfield, AL 35594 | $5,032 |
22 | Daniel Clement | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $4,330 |
23 | Tim Frederick | Hodges, AL 35571 | $4,322 |
24 | Anthony Mark Raper | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $4,132 |
25 | Chris Raper | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $4,122 |
26 | Larry P Cochran | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $4,023 |
27 | David E Scott | Decatur, AL 35602 | $3,601 |
28 | Eddie Fleming | Bear Creek, AL 35543 | $3,495 |
29 | Brandon Donald Mcduffa | Hodges, AL 35571 | $3,288 |
30 | Timothy Lynn Raper | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $3,204 |
31 | Casey Derrick Raper | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $3,093 |
32 | Gary Wayne Addison | Winfield, AL 35594 | $3,090 |
33 | Kyle D Fleming | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $3,086 |
34 | William Matthew Brasher | Winfield, AL 35594 | $3,056 |
35 | Gary Wayne Scott | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $2,992 |
36 | Shawn Randolph | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $2,933 |
37 | Greg Carter | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $2,910 |
38 | Brad J Nichols | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $2,795 |
39 | Rodney Wayne Hudson | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $2,681 |
40 | Phil Fowler | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $2,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”