Farm Subsidy information
Mobile County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Mobile County, Alabama, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mobile County, Alabama totaled $3,439,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bama Bay Oyster Farm LLC | Coden, AL 36523 | $7,030 |
22 | Robert W Coaker | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $6,339 |
23 | William H Coaker Jr | Leakesville, MS 39451 | $6,339 |
24 | Cooley Farms | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $4,883 |
25 | Cannon Farms | Theodore, AL 36590 | $4,802 |
26 | Sandra F Busby | Chunchula, AL 36521 | $4,758 |
27 | Hilton L Turner | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $3,530 |
28 | Williams Nursery, Inc. | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $3,398 |
29 | Alton E Hatchett Jr | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $3,242 |
30 | Ira Andrew Turner | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $3,113 |
31 | John Cieutat | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $3,054 |
32 | Clarke C. Willaims - Clarke C Williams 2014 Revoca | Lewisville, NC 27023 | $2,500 |
33 | Bernice Elizabeth Malone | Chunchula, AL 36521 | $2,310 |
34 | , | $2,114 | |
35 | Timothy M Jemison | Mobile, AL 36695 | $2,109 |
36 | Ethen Dean Tunstall | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $1,728 |
37 | Thomas E Cowart Jr | Mobile, AL 36619 | $1,545 |
38 | Thomas Paul Hopkins | Mount Vernon, AL 36560 | $1,482 |
39 | Dennis Martin Lewis | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $1,338 |
40 | David R Battiste | Mobile, AL 36695 | $1,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”