Farm Subsidy information
Mobile County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Mobile County, Alabama, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 70
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mobile County, Alabama totaled $5,529,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Davis Family Farms Partnership | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $15,423 |
22 | Taylor F Harper | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $13,501 |
23 | Carol D Pittman | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $11,410 |
24 | Daniel F Powell | Citronelle, AL 36522 | $8,012 |
25 | Mcgregor Farms LLC | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $7,201 |
26 | Alton E Hatchett Jr | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $6,881 |
27 | David Landry Enterprises LLC | Irvington, AL 36544 | $6,661 |
28 | Kenneth E Buck | Irvington, AL 36544 | $6,461 |
29 | J Anthony Faggard | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $6,459 |
30 | Warden Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $5,875 |
31 | Phillip Broadus Wittner | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $5,458 |
32 | Sandra F Busby | Chunchula, AL 36521 | $4,758 |
33 | Lawrence P Landry Jr | Theodore, AL 36582 | $4,713 |
34 | Freeland Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $4,583 |
35 | Timothy M Jemison | Mobile, AL 36695 | $4,478 |
36 | Southern Pearl Farms LLC | Irvington, AL 36544 | $3,720 |
37 | Irvin E Jemison | Irvington, AL 36544 | $3,699 |
38 | Danny Fritz | Irvington, AL 36544 | $3,631 |
39 | Bama Bay Oyster Farm LLC | Coden, AL 36523 | $3,428 |
40 | Jacquelene S Malone | Chunchula, AL 36521 | $2,777 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”