Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Montgomery County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 192
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Montgomery County, Alabama totaled $3,132,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Oneal Pringle | Ramer, AL 36069 | $7,131 |
82 | Matthew Luster | Montgomery, AL 36110 | $6,800 |
83 | J & B Cattle Co LLC | Montgomery, AL 36117 | $6,792 |
84 | Murray Miller | Montgomery, AL 36121 | $6,660 |
85 | Thomas R Kirksey | Pike Road, AL 36064 | $6,615 |
86 | W D Flowers Jr | Pike Road, AL 36064 | $6,457 |
87 | Malcolm J Hall | Montgomery, AL 36108 | $6,440 |
88 | Logan Mcneill | Lapine, AL 36046 | $6,157 |
89 | J J Menefee | Pine Level, AL 36065 | $5,849 |
90 | Martin T Faulkner | Montgomery, AL 36105 | $5,709 |
91 | Billy W Saucer | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $5,653 |
92 | Matthew R Pounds | Mathews, AL 36052 | $5,640 |
93 | Greg Owens | Mathews, AL 36052 | $5,532 |
94 | Oscar M Strickland III | Grady, AL 36036 | $5,455 |
95 | William Grey Mills Jr | Grady, AL 36036 | $5,358 |
96 | Annette Faulk | Lapine, AL 36046 | $5,286 |
97 | Gregory Maxwell | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $5,250 |
98 | Brian K Exford | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $5,218 |
99 | Lewis T Benefield | Montgomery, AL 36117 | $5,196 |
100 | Robert E Fulton Jr | Ramer, AL 36069 | $5,112 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”