Total Conservation Programs in Montgomery County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 351
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Montgomery County, Alabama totaled $14,714,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Troup R Cunningham Marital Trust | Montgomery, AL 36102 | $46,584 |
82 | Jean Lane-dorothy Arrington Trust | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $45,015 |
83 | Tim Wilsford | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $43,906 |
84 | Joe R Rutland | Fitzpatrick, AL 36029 | $43,420 |
85 | Joseph L Hall | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $42,030 |
86 | Stephan Sidney Turnipseed Gst | Pike Road, AL 36064 | $41,085 |
87 | David C Garrett | Montgomery, AL 36125 | $40,940 |
88 | Ronnie Elijah | Montgomery, AL 36109 | $40,767 |
89 | June M Turnipseed | Pike Road, AL 36064 | $39,660 |
90 | John C Carter Jr | Shorter, AL 36075 | $38,458 |
91 | Carol F Harris | Gulf Shores, AL 36542 | $36,207 |
92 | Weldon W Doe III | Montgomery, AL 36109 | $36,036 |
93 | Hettie H Harrington | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $35,618 |
94 | Rachel Johnson | Lake City, FL 32024 | $35,556 |
95 | Oscar E Wilson Dvm | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $33,018 |
96 | Cheryl Wilson | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $33,018 |
97 | Joe Hall | Montgomery, AL 36105 | $32,344 |
98 | Decker B Casey | Montgomery, AL 36108 | $32,060 |
99 | Elizabeth S Stallings | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $31,710 |
100 | Umphrey Bowling Jr | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $31,697 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”