Farm Subsidy information
Montgomery County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, Alabama, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 272
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, Alabama totaled $5,416,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Garry Henry | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $47,391 |
22 | Wisener Farms | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $47,271 |
23 | Joseph A Dorrill | Ramer, AL 36069 | $46,553 |
24 | Newell Farm LLC | Montgomery, AL 36124 | $45,705 |
25 | A & D Cattle Company LLC | Montgomery, AL 36110 | $44,220 |
26 | Felicia L Moore | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $41,272 |
27 | Woody Thrasher Cattle Company Inc | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $39,835 |
28 | Tom Russell | Lapine, AL 36046 | $38,906 |
29 | Parkman Land & Cattle Co. | Ramer, AL 36069 | $35,989 |
30 | Arrington Farms LLC | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $34,864 |
31 | Mitchell G Moore Jr | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $34,667 |
32 | Nathan L Lipscomb | Montgomery, AL 36116 | $34,620 |
33 | Ned D Lee III | Montgomery, AL 36117 | $34,446 |
34 | William Peavy | Hope Hull, AL 36043 | $33,758 |
35 | Ben Hitch | Montgomery, AL 36105 | $33,469 |
36 | Eugene F Moczygemba | Falls City, TX 78113 | $31,983 |
37 | Bob Brooks Jr | Montgomery, AL 36110 | $31,784 |
38 | Frank E Rutland | Fitzpatrick, AL 36029 | $31,663 |
39 | W A Smith Cattle LLC | Montgomery, AL 36105 | $31,585 |
40 | Regina Pugh | Mathews, AL 36052 | $31,223 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”