Production Flexibility Program in Russell County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 111
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Russell County, Alabama totaled $2,025,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Synovus Trust Co U/w/o Joe Jones | Columbus, GA 31902 | $12,614 |
22 | Jeremie Redden | Seale, AL 36875 | $12,449 |
23 | Elmo L Torbert | Hurtsboro, AL 36860 | $12,270 |
24 | Corine Mccoy | Columbus, GA 31902 | $11,030 |
25 | John Mott | Pittsview, AL 36871 | $10,248 |
26 | Judson H Upshaw | Hurtsboro, AL 36860 | $9,501 |
27 | Jason Greene | Louisville, AL 36048 | $9,244 |
28 | Gladys M Jackson | Herndon, VA 20170 | $9,146 |
29 | Charles A Mcelvey Jr | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $9,020 |
30 | Corcoran Farms Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $8,572 |
31 | B M Kirkland | Columbus, GA 31901 | $8,131 |
32 | Brian Allen | Auburn, AL 36832 | $8,113 |
33 | Stanley Durham | Pittsview, AL 36871 | $7,900 |
34 | Ronnie Johnson | Auburn, AL 36830 | $7,576 |
35 | Pamela A Simpson | Hatchechubbee, AL 36858 | $7,109 |
36 | Buford L Barnes | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $6,926 |
37 | Ridges Plantation Inc | Columbus, GA 31904 | $6,639 |
38 | Jeff Hall | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $6,188 |
39 | Charlie Mitchell | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $5,810 |
40 | Winnell Corcoran | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $5,424 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”