Farm Subsidy information
Russell County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Russell County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 550
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Russell County, Alabama totaled $42,291,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Frank Hendrick | Hurtsboro, AL 36860 | $35,785 |
122 | Torbert Bros | Opelika, AL 36804 | $35,684 |
123 | Anna Dudley Pamperin | Opelika, AL 36804 | $35,225 |
124 | Termika Jernigan | Union Springs, AL 36089 | $33,688 |
125 | Katharine Mclendon | Mary Esther, FL 32569 | $32,480 |
126 | First Union Natl Bank Of Ga U/w/o | Columbus, GA 31902 | $32,292 |
127 | Hugh M Lloyd | Hurtsboro, AL 36860 | $31,493 |
128 | Comer Lee Phelps | Troy, AL 36081 | $31,352 |
129 | Jean Goldstein | Atlanta, GA 30350 | $30,483 |
130 | Gerald Shirah | Opelika, AL 36804 | $30,029 |
131 | Noel Russell Dudley | Seale, AL 36875 | $29,651 |
132 | Ronnie Johnson | Auburn, AL 36830 | $29,097 |
133 | Charles A Mcelvey Jr | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $28,401 |
134 | Jeff Hall | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $28,018 |
135 | Matthew Mack | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $27,734 |
136 | Robert E Gullatte Jr | Salem, AL 36874 | $27,655 |
137 | , | $27,646 | |
138 | Frank Daniel | Pittsview, AL 36871 | $26,712 |
139 | Laney Farms | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $26,568 |
140 | Marengo Creek Farms Inc | Opelika, AL 36804 | $26,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”