Farm Subsidy information
Russell County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Russell County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 550
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Russell County, Alabama totaled $42,291,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Elizabeth D Burt Estate | Houston, TX 77035 | $22,740 |
162 | Kenneth N Miles | Pittsview, AL 36871 | $22,115 |
163 | Mrs R N Hebert | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $21,935 |
164 | B M Kirkland | Columbus, GA 31901 | $21,510 |
165 | Harrell's Trucking LLC | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $20,964 |
166 | Danny R Lindsey | Smiths, AL 36877 | $20,887 |
167 | Nancy Dudley Gordy | Columbus, GA 31901 | $20,591 |
168 | Twila Rhodes Kirkland | Seale, AL 36875 | $20,512 |
169 | Long Farms LLC | Banks, AL 36005 | $20,275 |
170 | David E Hooper | Apopka, FL 32703 | $20,175 |
171 | Mrs Sara A Davis | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $20,058 |
172 | Missionary Serv Of The Most Holy | Ft Mitchell, AL 36856 | $19,730 |
173 | Joseph Chancellor | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $19,295 |
174 | Marglobar Farm | Opelika, AL 36803 | $19,216 |
175 | May Belle Dixon | Hatchechubbee, AL 36858 | $19,076 |
176 | W Banks Herndon | Opelika, AL 36803 | $18,942 |
177 | Matthew Pamperin | Opelika, AL 36804 | $18,827 |
178 | Terri Cameron | Seale, AL 36875 | $18,770 |
179 | J E Norris Jr | Columbus, GA 31904 | $18,139 |
180 | Robert Ingram | Opelika, AL 36804 | $17,887 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”