Total Conservation Programs in Sumter County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 466
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sumter County, Alabama totaled $18,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Shirley Coleman | Oak Vale, MS 39656 | $137,425 |
42 | Atchafalaya Crawfish Processors I | Breaux Bridge, LA 70517 | $134,930 |
43 | Gary Lake | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $134,485 |
44 | Oakhurst Farm | Emelle, AL 35459 | $134,424 |
45 | Sage M Johnston | Destin, FL 32541 | $134,365 |
46 | Gary Witten | Aliceville, AL 35442 | $132,788 |
47 | Jim Allen Dial Sr | Emelle, AL 35459 | $130,965 |
48 | Mary Goldman | Livingston, AL 35470 | $127,501 |
49 | Federation Of Southern Coop | Epes, AL 35460 | $123,574 |
50 | Thomas B Smith Jr | Emelle, AL 35459 | $123,331 |
51 | Lewis Brothers Lumber Co Inc | Aliceville, AL 35442 | $121,385 |
52 | Ellis Coleman | Oak Vale, MS 39656 | $116,568 |
53 | E Roger Sayers | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $116,145 |
54 | Double B Corporation | Emelle, AL 35459 | $110,994 |
55 | W Myles Mayberry Jr | Demopolis, AL 36732 | $108,636 |
56 | Alan Hall | Livingston, AL 35470 | $103,302 |
57 | Clarence N Dial | Epes, AL 35460 | $101,982 |
58 | Mary Jane Nichols | Thomasville, GA 31757 | $100,358 |
59 | David P Henderson | Birmingham, AL 35203 | $98,832 |
60 | Emily Jane Dial | Scooba, MS 39358 | $97,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”