Conservation Reserve Program in Sumter County, Alabama, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 85
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sumter County, Alabama totaled $327,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rogers Family LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $4,894 |
22 | Donald J Ward | Livingston, AL 35470 | $4,600 |
23 | Betty Brockway Moore | Birmingham, AL 35244 | $4,577 |
24 | Sara C Buck | Emelle, AL 35459 | $4,547 |
25 | Jack Warbington | Livingston, AL 35470 | $4,450 |
26 | Freda Brown | Emelle, AL 35459 | $4,232 |
27 | Phifer Inc | Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 | $4,142 |
28 | E Roger Sayers | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $4,124 |
29 | Paradise LLC | Livingston, AL 35470 | $3,982 |
30 | Margie Campbell | Livingston, AL 35470 | $3,850 |
31 | A Frank Boyd Jr | Emelle, AL 35459 | $3,844 |
32 | Charles F Horton Family Trust | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $3,376 |
33 | David Henderson 2012 Irr Tr Fbo Ivy H Schuster | Vestavia, AL 35243 | $3,331 |
34 | David Henderson 2012 Irr Tr Fbo David Henderson Jr | Vestavia, AL 35243 | $3,331 |
35 | Federation Of Southern Coop | Epes, AL 35460 | $3,275 |
36 | Panola Land Buyers Association In | Gainesville, AL 35464 | $3,275 |
37 | Poole's Farm | Emelle, AL 35459 | $3,087 |
38 | Thomas B Smith Jr | Emelle, AL 35459 | $2,943 |
39 | Boone Ballistics LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 | $2,508 |
40 | Max F. Larkin, Jr. Family Partner | Shoal Creek, AL 35242 | $2,270 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”