Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Tallapoosa County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 42
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Tallapoosa County, Alabama totaled $113,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jerry Lee Evers | Alexander City, AL 35011 | $1,870 |
22 | Donald E Phillips | Dadeville, AL 36853 | $1,853 |
23 | Christopher N Langley | Camp Hill, AL 36850 | $1,813 |
24 | Mrs W D Vickers | Montgomery, AL 36109 | $1,655 |
25 | Dewitt Cullars | Tallassee, AL 36078 | $1,648 |
26 | David E Brantley | Notasulga, AL 36866 | $1,133 |
27 | Charles Morgan | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $1,062 |
28 | Maurice Maloney Jr | Cotter, AR 72626 | $1,050 |
29 | John E Rigby | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $1,020 |
30 | Henry L Moss | Notasulga, AL 36866 | $885 |
31 | Jim Ed Abernathy | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $806 |
32 | Glenn Handley | Luverne, AL 36049 | $800 |
33 | Johnny F Farrow | Camp Hill, AL 36850 | $759 |
34 | Allen Lee Lester | Jacksons Gap, AL 36861 | $590 |
35 | Twyla Harris | Valley, AL 36854 | $546 |
36 | Tamara Johnston | Valley, AL 36854 | $546 |
37 | Horace Moran | Dadeville, AL 36853 | $496 |
38 | Bertram Barnett | Goodwater, AL 35072 | $482 |
39 | Bradley T East | Alexander City, AL 35010 | $472 |
40 | William George Carleton | Dadeville, AL 36853 | $358 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”