Farm Subsidy information
Tuscaloosa County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 681
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama totaled $30,608,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bobo Farms | Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 | $2,888,769 |
2 | Hughes Brothers Farms | Northport, AL 35475 | $2,142,699 |
3 | Wiggins Farm | Ralph, AL 35480 | $2,091,778 |
4 | R & S Farms Inc | Ralph, AL 35480 | $978,996 |
5 | John E Walker III | Berry, AL 35546 | $925,804 |
6 | Farley Forest | Tuscaloosa, AL 35407 | $924,006 |
7 | Robert Nuckols | Northport, AL 35475 | $787,601 |
8 | Gilliam Farms | Ralph, AL 35480 | $730,964 |
9 | Anders Enterprises Inc | Northport, AL 35473 | $690,116 |
10 | John E Walker Iv | Berry, AL 35546 | $586,244 |
11 | J E Walker & Son Inc | Berry, AL 35546 | $537,795 |
12 | Ingram Cattle Farm | Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 | $494,739 |
13 | Hughes Brothers Farms LLC | Berry, AL 35546 | $404,809 |
14 | Forrest L Wiggins | Ralph, AL 35480 | $387,595 |
15 | Moon Lake Farm LLC | Coker, AL 35452 | $370,385 |
16 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $352,681 |
17 | Hughes Farms | Northport, AL 35475 | $332,395 |
18 | C & C Construction LLC | Duncanville, AL 35456 | $270,415 |
19 | James Amond Herndon | Tuscaloosa, AL 35405 | $246,691 |
20 | Alawest-al LLC | Northport, AL 35476 | $242,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>