Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Wilcox County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 118
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Wilcox County, Alabama totaled $795,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | George W Fendley III | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,664 |
82 | David Mingo Jr | Daytona Beach, FL 32117 | $1,584 |
83 | Marlon Lymon | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,511 |
84 | Demus L Smith Sr | Pine Apple, AL 36768 | $1,360 |
85 | Prince Arnold | Oak Hill, AL 36766 | $1,328 |
86 | Ms Kitty Victoria Thompson | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,302 |
87 | Adrian Johns | Douglasville, GA 30134 | $1,289 |
88 | Mike Duffle | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,284 |
89 | Russell Moore | Pine Hill, AL 36769 | $1,273 |
90 | Christopher Stone Jr | Pine Apple, AL 36768 | $1,254 |
91 | Eugene Johnson Jr | Mc Calla, AL 35111 | $1,246 |
92 | Randy Thompson | Pine Hill, AL 36769 | $1,212 |
93 | Archie Lee Dortch | Coy, AL 36435 | $1,200 |
94 | William Morton | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,194 |
95 | Robert E Pettway | Alberta, AL 36720 | $1,133 |
96 | James D Johnson | Pine Hill, AL 36769 | $1,127 |
97 | Nathaniel Robinson | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,093 |
98 | Addie Nicholson | Alberta, AL 36720 | $1,078 |
99 | John R Moton Sr | Camden, AL 36726 | $1,064 |
100 | Lonnie Pettway | Boykin, AL 36723 | $1,005 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”