Farm Subsidy information
Alaska
Total Subsidies in Alaska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,506
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alaska totaled $59,874,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Pyramid Peak LLC | Wasilla, AK 99623 | $123,054 |
122 | Dennis James Oneil | Petersburg, AK 99833 | $122,379 |
123 | Starwind Fisheries LLC | Anchor Point, AK 99556 | $122,127 |
124 | Kyle David Wisner | Anchor Point, AK 99556 | $121,999 |
125 | Rolling Bay Fisheries LLC | Kodiak, AK 99615 | $121,614 |
126 | Myles Purington | Homer, AK 99603 | $120,195 |
127 | Mark Roth | Homer, AK 99603 | $119,143 |
128 | Kiwi Crab LLC | Anchorage, AK 99509 | $118,793 |
129 | Jacob Hanohano | Kodiak, AK 99615 | $118,665 |
130 | Duke Ogata | Sand Point, AK 99661 | $117,869 |
131 | Jeb S Phillips | Petersburg, AK 99833 | $116,965 |
132 | Sea Pride LLC | Seward, AK 99664 | $116,053 |
133 | Bradley Stuart Haynes | Ketchikan, AK 99901 | $115,919 |
134 | Brice Phillips | Cordova, AK 99574 | $115,302 |
135 | Endurance Fisheries Inc | Chignik Lagoon, AK 99565 | $115,129 |
136 | Good Hope Fisheries LLC | Seward, AK 99664 | $115,114 |
137 | Thompson Maritime LLC | Petersburg, AK 99833 | $114,618 |
138 | Reiver Fisheries LLC | Sitka, AK 99835 | $114,200 |
139 | Jeremy Anderson | Chignik Lagoon, AK 99565 | $113,837 |
140 | F-v Temptation Inc | Sand Point, AK 99661 | $113,691 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”