Dairy Programs in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 226
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $41,214,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Boschma Farms | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $496,372 |
22 | Casa Grande Dairy Company LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $462,039 |
23 | Double D Dairy Ltd | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $448,094 |
24 | Anthony Russell Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $447,285 |
25 | Sunrise Dairy Farm LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $440,128 |
26 | Milky Way Dairy LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $431,127 |
27 | Thomas Michael Dugan Jr | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $427,453 |
28 | Dutchview Dairy Too LLC | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $420,637 |
29 | Timothy Scott Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $418,054 |
30 | Jg Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $375,132 |
31 | Desperado Dairy LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $373,594 |
32 | Kerr Family Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $359,217 |
33 | Chiquita Dairy LLC | Peoria, AZ 85380 | $358,385 |
34 | D & I Holsteins LLC | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $351,965 |
35 | Van Der Waerden Dairy LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $342,031 |
36 | Ambian Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $340,585 |
37 | Stotz Farming | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $326,854 |
38 | Jerome La Salvia Dairy | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $325,179 |
39 | De Jong Dairy | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $310,038 |
40 | Rio Blanco LLC | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $305,393 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”