Total Commodity Programs in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 12,783
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $1,704,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Greer Farms 91 | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $1,861,040 |
202 | R A T Farms Ptshp | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $1,846,221 |
203 | Le Smith Farms Ptshp | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $1,845,216 |
204 | Butterfield Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,840,054 |
205 | Jarnagin Farms Ptn 96 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $1,839,609 |
206 | Glenbar Trucking Corp | Pima, AZ 85543 | $1,836,951 |
207 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $1,825,608 |
208 | Double R Farms Ptshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,804,147 |
209 | Casino Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85140 | $1,803,426 |
210 | Nichols Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $1,800,891 |
211 | Itty Bitty Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,775,430 |
212 | Gila Monster Joint Venture | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $1,773,344 |
213 | Lower River Ranch | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,769,137 |
214 | Triple G Dairy Lllp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,745,339 |
215 | J-v Farms, Inc | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $1,735,891 |
216 | Rogers Farms | Pearce, AZ 85625 | $1,721,540 |
217 | Gladden Family Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $1,720,429 |
218 | Barcello Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85299 | $1,719,791 |
219 | R & S Farms Ptn | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,719,121 |
220 | Jonathan W Householder Itty Bitty | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,716,301 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”