Market Loss Assistance Program in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,408
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Arizona totaled $142,648,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Paloma Partners II | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $399,830 |
62 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $382,988 |
63 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $376,036 |
64 | Prechel Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $371,195 |
65 | D B Farms | Channahon, IL 60410 | $370,464 |
66 | Dane Farms | Willcox, AZ 85644 | $364,398 |
67 | B B F Farming 93 | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $362,126 |
68 | Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85395 | $360,000 |
69 | Accomazzo Company General Partnership | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $359,715 |
70 | Riggins Farms II | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $355,528 |
71 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $351,350 |
72 | Buckelew Farms II Ptns | Parker, AZ 85344 | $344,711 |
73 | Eagle Tail Farming Partnership | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $341,088 |
74 | Jpl Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $338,220 |
75 | Ken Sheely Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $337,326 |
76 | Hbe Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $336,220 |
77 | Knapple & Shelton II | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $332,020 |
78 | Act Farms II | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $330,335 |
79 | Daley Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85259 | $328,842 |
80 | Rhuts Ranch | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $327,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”