Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,239
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Arizona totaled $14,564,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Taylor's Herb Gardens Of Az Inc. | Congress, AZ 85332 | $44,231 |
82 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $44,230 |
83 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $44,096 |
84 | Salzman Farms | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $43,747 |
85 | Ciesto C & Shirley A Leivas Dba C & S Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $43,244 |
86 | Bartlett & Bartlett Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $42,974 |
87 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $42,894 |
88 | Red Bullet Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $42,343 |
89 | Wiechens Farming, Inc. | Roll, AZ 85347 | $42,325 |
90 | Cow Chow Croppers | Glendale, AZ 85303 | $42,272 |
91 | Steve Daley Farms Partnership | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $41,646 |
92 | Gable & Hardison Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $40,945 |
93 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $40,450 |
94 | Zamora Farms | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $39,916 |
95 | V 7 Picacho Farms | Mesa, AZ 85201 | $38,907 |
96 | Poole Farms LLC | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $38,135 |
97 | C L Z Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $37,859 |
98 | C M Farming LLC | Gilbert, AZ 85298 | $37,859 |
99 | Timothy E Hastings | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $37,457 |
100 | Lamb Farms II 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85295 | $36,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”