Farm Subsidy information
Arizona
Total Subsidies in Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,157
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arizona totaled $127,194,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lm Hancock Farms LLC | Wittmann, AZ 85361 | $152,093 |
102 | Button Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $150,911 |
103 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $148,912 |
104 | Krentz Ranch Operations LLC | Douglas, AZ 85608 | $148,651 |
105 | Doug & Tina Dunlap Joint Venture | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $148,334 |
106 | Sierra Bonita Ranch LLC | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $146,317 |
107 | Itty Bitty Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $146,161 |
108 | Sierra West Farms | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $144,241 |
109 | Salzman Cattle Company LLC | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $143,804 |
110 | Rodney C Devine | Scottsdale, AZ 85255 | $143,245 |
111 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $141,813 |
112 | Zamora Farms | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $141,027 |
113 | Don Pew Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $140,819 |
114 | Cactus Lane Farming | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $140,280 |
115 | Sierra Negra Farms | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $138,672 |
116 | Swan Farms | Cibola, AZ 85328 | $138,636 |
117 | Sasco Cattle Co LLC | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $136,980 |
118 | Cienega Ranch LLC | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $134,759 |
119 | Steve Daley Farms Partnership | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $134,364 |
120 | Arivaca Ranch LLC | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $134,313 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”