Total Conservation Programs in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,445
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $30,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Carl H Hawley | Mc Neal, AZ 85617 | $50,000 |
102 | Cienega Ranch LLC | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $50,000 |
103 | Hope I Jones Estate | Tucson, AZ 85715 | $49,865 |
104 | Stephen R Townsend | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $49,845 |
105 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $49,788 |
106 | V & K Wakimoto Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $49,572 |
107 | Haas Ranch General Partnership | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $49,211 |
108 | Peterson Land & Cattle Corporatio | Douglas, AZ 85608 | $49,205 |
109 | Bkw Farms Inc | Marana, AZ 85653 | $49,061 |
110 | Ruth Evelyn Cowan | Tombstone, AZ 85638 | $48,984 |
111 | James K Shaw Dba J & M Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $48,841 |
112 | Dixon Farms Ptshp Dba Lbj Farms | Wilson, NC 27893 | $48,600 |
113 | Tyson And Stacey Stuhr Farm | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $48,596 |
114 | Sand Hill Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $48,564 |
115 | Robert G Everts | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $48,072 |
116 | Kaibab Paiute Tribal Council | Fredonia, AZ 86022 | $47,780 |
117 | Youngker & Youngker II 93 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $47,377 |
118 | Smt Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $47,056 |
119 | Anderson Palmisano Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $46,968 |
120 | Brian Laprairie | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $46,913 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”