Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,932
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Arizona totaled $85,437,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Fox Butte Growers | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $191,855 |
122 | Vip Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $191,488 |
123 | Auza Ranches LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $190,814 |
124 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $189,264 |
125 | Boschma Farms | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $185,662 |
126 | Woodman Family Citrus Lp | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $182,478 |
127 | El Valle Grande Cattle LLC | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $182,435 |
128 | Joseph Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $181,769 |
129 | Piazzo Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $181,222 |
130 | Jg Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $181,210 |
131 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $180,323 |
132 | Cattlemex Inc. | Tubac, AZ 85646 | $180,290 |
133 | Jerry D Ethington | Queen Creek, AZ 85140 | $177,589 |
134 | Cross Creek Dairy | Dinuba, CA 93618 | $175,541 |
135 | Buckelew Farms II Ptns | Parker, AZ 85344 | $173,629 |
136 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $167,142 |
137 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $166,621 |
138 | Bowie Pecans Inc | Bowie, AZ 85605 | $165,788 |
139 | Wofford Farms LLC | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $164,110 |
140 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $161,530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”